| Author |
Message |
Eli
Guest
|
 Posted:
Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:49 pm Post subject:
Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
Does anyone have any experience with or opinions of the Brady ID Pal
handheld labeler? I'm not a full-time installer but need a cable
labeler and this new model from Brady is considerably less expensive
than their TLS 2200. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dmitri(Cabling-Design.com
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
Eli wrote:
| Quote: | Does anyone have any experience with or opinions of the Brady ID Pal
handheld labeler? I'm not a full-time installer but need a cable
labeler and this new model from Brady is considerably less expensive
than their TLS 2200.
|
Especially for a non-full time installer I would recommend looking at
Brother P-Touch PT-1650 labeler. It is a very nice machine, has features
comparable to big names in the industrial labeling (like cable flags,
cable wraps, patch panel ports etc.), supports printing from a database,
templates, special symbols (including warning labels), barcodes, your
company's logo, you name it. In the field or from your computer via USB
interface. And, the price is right: you can get it on the Net within $105
to $150 range. Of course, for durability you may want to use Industrial
Series TZ-tape, which tends to be a little bit expensive (not too much
though), but in plenty situations (like outlet and patch-panel labels that
do not have to flex) you can get away with a simple Staples-bough TZ tape.
Variety of colors and widths for the tapes are supported, so you're not
stuck with black/white simple design label and can give it a nice little
touch of your own.
Anyways, I think you'll like this labeler for both install and office uses.
--
Dmitri Abaimov, RCDD
http://www.cabling-design.com
Cabling Forum, color codes, pinouts and other useful resources for
premises cabling users and pros
http://www.cabling-design.com/homecabling
Residential Cabling Guide
-------------------------------------
##-----------------------------------------------##
Article posted with Cabling-Design.com Newsgroup Archive
http://www.cabling-design.com/forums
no-spam read and post WWW interface to your favorite newsgroup -
comp.dcom.cabling - 1083 messages and counting!
##-----------------------------------------------## |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:07 am Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
Eli wrote:
| Quote: | Does anyone have any experience with or opinions of the Brady ID Pal
handheld labeler? I'm not a full-time installer but need a cable
labeler and this new model from Brady is considerably less expensive
than their TLS 2200.
|
I'm currently using Id pal right now for all my labelling, works quite
good, the only problem for me is hard to get the catridge here in
malaysia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Crackhead
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:02 am Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
You make some good points about Brother label makers, which, btw, I think
are great (I own two).
However, the TZ-Tape is not suitable for round cables/wire marking. TZ-Tape
was designed to be semi-permanent (which is great that it can be removed),
but on cables (rounded surface) it will eventually peel off.
The Brady ID Pal is great because the labels are available in nylon,
polyester, and vinyl. (TZ-Tape is polyester) ID Pal labels can stick to
things TZ-Tape can't (like textured or round surfaces). You want to use
nylon labels for cables. The ID Pal is more installer oriented, whereas the
Brother is more office oriented.
As a general purpose labeler, the Brother is a lot more functional (great
for office stuff). But, the fact that the ID Pal labels are useable for
round cables and highly textured surfaces makes it a lot more useful for
installs.
Dymo has a new labeler that looks like it was designed to compete with the
ID Pal, I haven't tried it - but it is a little cheaper:
http://www.graphicproducts.com/labelers/dymo-rhino-pro/
"Dmitri(Cabling-Design.com)" <info_at_cabling-design_dot_com@foo.com> wrote
in message news:F2UFd.755209$2W1.58744@news.easynews.com...
| Quote: | Eli wrote:
Especially for a non-full time installer I would recommend looking at
Brother P-Touch PT-1650 labeler. It is a very nice machine, has features
comparable to big names in the industrial labeling (like cable flags,
cable wraps, patch panel ports etc.), supports printing from a database,
templates, special symbols (including warning labels), barcodes, your
company's logo, you name it. In the field or from your computer via USB
interface. And, the price is right: you can get it on the Net within $105
to $150 range. Of course, for durability you may want to use Industrial
Series TZ-tape, which tends to be a little bit expensive (not too much
though), but in plenty situations (like outlet and patch-panel labels that
do not have to flex) you can get away with a simple Staples-bough TZ tape.
Variety of colors and widths for the tapes are supported, so you're not
stuck with black/white simple design label and can give it a nice little
touch of your own. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dmitri(Cabling-Design.com
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:03 am Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
Crackhead wrote:
| Quote: | You make some good points about Brother label makers, which, btw, I
think
are great (I own two).
However, the TZ-Tape is not suitable for round cables/wire marking.
TZ-Tape
was designed to be semi-permanent (which is great that it can be
removed),
but on cables (rounded surface) it will eventually peel off.
The Brady ID Pal is great because the labels are available in nylon,
polyester, and vinyl. (TZ-Tape is polyester) ID Pal labels can stick to
things TZ-Tape can't (like textured or round surfaces). You want to use
nylon labels for cables. The ID Pal is more installer oriented, whereas
the
Brother is more office oriented.
As a general purpose labeler, the Brother is a lot more functional
(great
for office stuff). But, the fact that the ID Pal labels are useable for
round cables and highly textured surfaces makes it a lot more useful
for
installs.
Dymo has a new labeler that looks like it was designed to compete with
the
ID Pal, I haven't tried it - but it is a little cheaper:
http://www.graphicproducts.com/labelers/dymo-rhino-pro/
|
Brother makes two types of TZ-Tape that will be most appropriate for
labeling in the cabling industry: "Flexible ID" (i.e. TZFX-231) and "Extra
Strength Adhesive" (i.e. TZS-131). The names are pretty self-explanatory
with the second one more suited for textured surfaces. They both are tad
more expensive than the regular, office type ones, but hold better in the
harsh environment. As a matter of fact, if you use "flag" type cable ID
instead of "wrap-around", you can even get away with inexpensive office TZ
tape. Flag-type cable IDs look kinda silly in large cable bundles, but for
an occasional cable installer would do the job just nicely.
In my mind the Brother PT-1650s were probably the best investment we ever
made in a labeler, both from cabling and office stand point. We also have
Panduit's one that no one uses ever since we got PT-1650. It's not that
anything is particularly wrong with that machine, it's just 1650s are some
much more versatile.
--
Dmitri Abaimov, RCDD
http://www.cabling-design.com
Cabling Forum, color codes, pinouts and other useful resources for
premises cabling users and pros
http://www.cabling-design.com/homecabling
Residential Cabling Guide
-------------------------------------
##-----------------------------------------------#
Article posted with Cabling-Design.com Newsgroup Archiv
http://www.cabling-design.com/forum
no-spam read and post WWW interface to your favorite newsgroup -
comp.dcom.cabling - 1107 messages and counting
##-----------------------------------------------## |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Al Dykes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:17 am Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
In article <1BgHd.981401$2W1.75290@news.easynews.com>,
Dmitri(Cabling-Design.com) <info_at_cabling-design_dot_com@foo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Crackhead wrote:
You make some good points about Brother label makers, which, btw, I
think
are great (I own two).
However, the TZ-Tape is not suitable for round cables/wire marking.
TZ-Tape
was designed to be semi-permanent (which is great that it can be
removed),
but on cables (rounded surface) it will eventually peel off.
The Brady ID Pal is great because the labels are available in nylon,
polyester, and vinyl. (TZ-Tape is polyester) ID Pal labels can stick to
things TZ-Tape can't (like textured or round surfaces). You want to use
nylon labels for cables. The ID Pal is more installer oriented, whereas
the
Brother is more office oriented.
As a general purpose labeler, the Brother is a lot more functional
(great
for office stuff). But, the fact that the ID Pal labels are useable for
round cables and highly textured surfaces makes it a lot more useful
for
installs.
Dymo has a new labeler that looks like it was designed to compete with
the
ID Pal, I haven't tried it - but it is a little cheaper:
http://www.graphicproducts.com/labelers/dymo-rhino-pro/
Brother makes two types of TZ-Tape that will be most appropriate for
labeling in the cabling industry: "Flexible ID" (i.e. TZFX-231) and "Extra
Strength Adhesive" (i.e. TZS-131). The names are pretty self-explanatory
with the second one more suited for textured surfaces. They both are tad
more expensive than the regular, office type ones, but hold better in the
harsh environment. As a matter of fact, if you use "flag" type cable ID
instead of "wrap-around", you can even get away with inexpensive office TZ
tape. Flag-type cable IDs look kinda silly in large cable bundles, but for
an occasional cable installer would do the job just nicely.
In my mind the Brother PT-1650s were probably the best investment we ever
made in a labeler, both from cabling and office stand point. We also have
Panduit's one that no one uses ever since we got PT-1650. It's not that
anything is particularly wrong with that machine, it's just 1650s are some
much more versatile.
--
Dmitri Abaimov, RCDD
|
Several years ago I labeled a bunch of cables with a Ptouch. The tape
was the stuff that came with the machine. I whatpped the labels
around the cable like a flag, so the tape was sticking to itself.
In a year or so all the labels fell off. The glue sticks to everything
but itself.
For thicker cable I've used an office labeler, placed the label the
long way on the cable and then wrapped it with Scotch "Magic"
tape. It's mylar and good for just about anything.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dmitri(Cabling-Design.com
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:38 am Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
Al Dykes wrote:
| Quote: | Several years ago I labeled a bunch of cables with a Ptouch. The tape
was the stuff that came with the machine. I whatpped the labels
around the cable like a flag, so the tape was sticking to itself.
In a year or so all the labels fell off. The glue sticks to everything
but itself.
For thicker cable I've used an office labeler, placed the label the
long way on the cable and then wrapped it with Scotch "Magic"
tape. It's mylar and good for just about anything.
|
Hmm... We never had such devastating results in the past, but the warning
is well received. I don't think it's wise not to spend a half cent more
per label for Flex ID tape now so you don't have to go back (other than
for a new business) just a year later.
Just out of curiosity: what was the environment like: hot, cold, nothing
in particular?
--
Dmitri Abaimov, RCDD
http://www.cabling-design.com
Cabling Forum, color codes, pinouts and other useful resources for
premises cabling users and pros
http://www.cabling-design.com/homecabling
Residential Cabling Guide
-------------------------------------
##-----------------------------------------------#
Article posted with Cabling-Design.com Newsgroup Archiv
http://www.cabling-design.com/forum
no-spam read and post WWW interface to your favorite newsgroup -
comp.dcom.cabling - 1110 messages and counting
##-----------------------------------------------## |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Al Dykes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:02 am Post subject:
Re: Brady ID Pal Labeler |
|
|
In article <k6hHd.982780$2W1.74960@news.easynews.com>,
Dmitri(Cabling-Design.com) <info_at_cabling-design_dot_com@foo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Al Dykes wrote:
Several years ago I labeled a bunch of cables with a Ptouch. The tape
was the stuff that came with the machine. I whatpped the labels
around the cable like a flag, so the tape was sticking to itself.
In a year or so all the labels fell off. The glue sticks to everything
but itself.
For thicker cable I've used an office labeler, placed the label the
long way on the cable and then wrapped it with Scotch "Magic"
tape. It's mylar and good for just about anything.
Hmm... We never had such devastating results in the past, but the warning
is well received. I don't think it's wise not to spend a half cent more
per label for Flex ID tape now so you don't have to go back (other than
for a new business) just a year later.
Just out of curiosity: what was the environment like: hot, cold, nothing
in particular?
--
Dmitri Abaimov, RCDD
http://www.cabling-design.com
Cabling Forum, color codes, pinouts and other useful resources for
premises cabling users and pros
http://www.cabling-design.com/homecabling
Residential Cabling Guide
-------------------------------------
|
Climate-controlled computer room.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in