VPN: Router-to-Router or Client-to-Router??
DComTalk.com Forum Index DComTalk.com
Discussion of VoIP, VPN, Video Conferencen, DSL and other data commucations.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web dcomtalk.com
VPN: Router-to-Router or Client-to-Router??

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DComTalk.com Forum Index -> VPN
Author Message
Jester
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:20 pm    Post subject: VPN: Router-to-Router or Client-to-Router?? Reply with quote

Hi all,

Want to set up a VPN between a small peer-to-peer lan and two other home
users. Two sites are on DSL, third is FiOS... all have dynamic IPs. I'm
quite familiar with D-Link products, so I'll be using these models for
reference, but feel free to suggest other options (but tell me why
please)... here are my brainstorming results...

1- Three inexpensive DI-804HVs... One at each site... using best security
available between them.

PROS (As I perceive them):
- Possibly better security than using XP client??
- If any site expands, can just plug in additional PCs to to local lans and
not bother with additional connections on PC. Not a big deal, but hey.
- Dial-up access to each site through modem plugged into DB9 port on
DI-804HV (Don't need it right now, but easily might in future)

CONS:
- "Always on" VPN between sites. Greater possibility of attack??

2- One inexpensive DI-804HV at main site... XP client at each remote PC.
PROS:
- Least expensive option.
- When remote PCs are off, there's no tunnel active. Although I realize the
router would be willing to "accept" a potential connection. So I don;t knwo
if my "always on" fear is valid.
- Dial-up access to main site through DB9 port.
CONS:
- Limits me to PPTP.
- Any other security/performance concerns I might be missing.

3- One DFL-200 at main site, NETDEFEND client or DI_804HVs at remotes.
PROS:
- Faster VPN performance (supposedly) I know the "A" in ADSL will affect
speed more than anything.
- Can use NETDEFEND client at remote sites for more robust security.
- Can manage bandwidth to each tunnel.
- Can also use XP client in a pinch.
- Also has DB9 port
CONS:
- A bit more money than I planned.


So basically, my main question is: What are the advantages/disadvantages
of router-to-router vs. client-to-router setups??
Which of the above is best for simple file-sharing between sites? Each site
has net access, each site has printers. We just need some very simple
50-100k files accessed every now and then, and at worst, a 1-2mb PDF might
have to be opened on occasion.

Thanks in advance!

Jester
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DComTalk.com Forum Index -> VPN All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




VoIP Solutions: Telephone Systems Electronics Satellite TV Tech & Gadgets
Powered by phpBB