Simplest hardware node

Discussions of the Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 protocols.

Simplest hardware node

Postby bmearns » Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:20 am

I'm looking for the simplest possible hardare implementation that I can
connect via cat5 ethernet cable to my router that my router will
recognize as a node on the network, and be willing to send it data,
even if that data is simply dropped on the floor, so to speak.

Is it possible to just use a power supply and ground to set certain
pins on the cable a constant high or low?

Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
bmearns
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby glen herrmannsfeldt » Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:20 am

bmearns wrote:

I'm looking for the simplest possible hardare implementation that I can
connect via cat5 ethernet cable to my router that my router will
recognize as a node on the network, and be willing to send it data,
even if that data is simply dropped on the floor, so to speak.

Is it possible to just use a power supply and ground to set certain
pins on the cable a constant high or low?

Oh, that's what you mean.

A 10baseT transceiver and a power supply should do it.

-- glen
glen herrmannsfeldt
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby James Knott » Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:20 pm

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

bmearns wrote:

I'm looking for the simplest possible hardare implementation that I can
connect via cat5 ethernet cable to my router that my router will
recognize as a node on the network, and be willing to send it data,
even if that data is simply dropped on the floor, so to speak.

Is it possible to just use a power supply and ground to set certain
pins on the cable a constant high or low?

Oh, that's what you mean.

A 10baseT transceiver and a power supply should do it.

-- glen

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

BTW, please don't request an e-mail reply for a question posted in the
newsgroup. If you can't be bothered to check back here, we can't be
bothered to reply.
James Knott
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby bmearns » Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:20 pm

Thanks for both response;

I'm actually looking to expand this project slightly, do you know of
anything even simpler (in terms of hardware, not effort) that I could
do, say with a bread board?


"If you can't be bothered to check back here, we can't be
bothered to reply."


That's a good point, James thank you, I won't do that anymore.
bmearns
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby Gerard Bok » Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:59 pm

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:55:29 -0500, James Knott
<james.knott@rogers.com> wrote:

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

bmearns wrote:

I'm looking for the simplest possible hardare implementation that I can
connect via cat5 ethernet cable to my router that my router will
recognize as a node on the network, and be willing to send it data,
even if that data is simply dropped on the floor, so to speak.

Is it possible to just use a power supply and ground to set certain
pins on the cable a constant high or low?

Oh, that's what you mean.

A 10baseT transceiver and a power supply should do it.

-- glen

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

Are you sure a router would actually dump data to a hub or switch
without any other connection ?

I would expect some ARP requests --at most--, but no payload :-)

--
Kind regards,
Gerard Bok
Gerard Bok
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby James Knott » Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:50 am

Gerard Bok wrote:

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

Are you sure a router would actually dump data to a hub or switch
without any other connection ?


Something like UDP or ICMP would work fine, as they don't require a
"connection" to the other computer, the way TCP does. All they need, is a
working network connection and they don't care what's beyond.
James Knott
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby spammersarevermin » Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:20 am

On 23 Nov 2005 22:17:19 -0800, bmearns blurted:

I'm looking for the simplest possible hardare implementation that I can
connect via cat5 ethernet cable to my router that my router will
recognize as a node on the network, and be willing to send it data,
even if that data is simply dropped on the floor, so to speak.

Is it possible to just use a power supply and ground to set certain
pins on the cable a constant high or low?

Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.


www.edtp.com packet whacker
www.lantronics.com
http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/

etc...

HTH
Spamming this account signifies
your unqualified consent to a free security audit
spammersarevermin
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby Gerard Bok » Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:36 am

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:50:01 -0500, James Knott
<james.knott@rogers.com> wrote:

Gerard Bok wrote:

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

Are you sure a router would actually dump data to a hub or switch
without any other connection ?


Something like UDP or ICMP would work fine, as they don't require a
"connection" to the other computer, the way TCP does. All they need, is a
working network connection and they don't care what's beyond.

Sorry, but that's not what I meant.
Your 'connection' is a logical one.
I was refering to the lack of a physical connection.

UDP or ICMP need a link to travel on. I think :-)

Think 127.0.0.1. Always connected, never a signal :-)

--
Kind regards,
Gerard Bok
Gerard Bok
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby glen herrmannsfeldt » Fri Nov 25, 2005 12:20 pm

James Knott wrote:
(I wrote)

Oh, that's what you mean.

A 10baseT transceiver and a power supply should do it.

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

He ask for the simplest. I have heard of people powering a transceiver
off a standard 9 volt battery, though probably not for very long.

I used to know a machine with automatic AUI/10base2 switching which
relied on a minimum current through the AUI power pins to do the
switching.

It is probably now so hard to build the logic to generate link pulses,
but transceivers are already designed to do that.

-- glen
glen herrmannsfeldt
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby James Knott » Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:20 pm

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

He ask for the simplest. I have heard of people powering a transceiver
off a standard 9 volt battery, though probably not for very long.


Or, if he can find one, and old 10base2 NIC, a T coupler and a pair of
terminators should do it too. He could also use a 24 ohm resistor, in
place of the coupler and two terminators. Can't get much simpler than
that.
James Knott
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby Gerard Bok » Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:20 pm

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 07:25:26 -0500, James Knott
<james.knott@rogers.com> wrote:

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

He ask for the simplest. I have heard of people powering a transceiver
off a standard 9 volt battery, though probably not for very long.


Or, if he can find one, and old 10base2 NIC, a T coupler and a pair of
terminators should do it too. He could also use a 24 ohm resistor, in
place of the coupler and two terminators. Can't get much simpler than
that.

It seems to get simpler and simpler :-)

But how would an ancient NIC (unpowered ?) and a 24 ohm resistor
been recognized (as a node) by a router, let alone tempt it to
transmit data ?

--
Kind regards,
Gerard Bok
Gerard Bok
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby James Knott » Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:58 pm

Gerard Bok wrote:

Or, if he can find one, and old 10base2 NIC, a T coupler and a pair of
terminators should do it too. He could also use a 24 ohm resistor, in
place of the coupler and two terminators. Can't get much simpler than
that.

It seems to get simpler and simpler :-)

But how would an ancient NIC (unpowered ?) and a 24 ohm resistor
been recognized (as a node) by a router, let alone tempt it to
transmit data ?


I would assume that if he's trying to send data, he'd have a NIC somewhere.
If he can plug in a 10base2 NIC, that should do. It gets the power from
the computer. All he needs is a NIC of some time that's connected to a
real circuit. With twisted pair, that means he needs a switch or hub to
plug into, with coax type NIC, he only needs the proper termination.
James Knott
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby Gerard Bok » Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:57 pm

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:58:18 -0500, James Knott
<james.knott@rogers.com> wrote:

Gerard Bok wrote:

Or, if he can find one, and old 10base2 NIC, a T coupler and a pair of
terminators should do it too. He could also use a 24 ohm resistor, in
place of the coupler and two terminators. Can't get much simpler than
that.

It seems to get simpler and simpler :-)

But how would an ancient NIC (unpowered ?) and a 24 ohm resistor
been recognized (as a node) by a router, let alone tempt it to
transmit data ?


I would assume that if he's trying to send data, he'd have a NIC somewhere.
If he can plug in a 10base2 NIC, that should do. It gets the power from
the computer. All he needs is a NIC of some time that's connected to a
real circuit. With twisted pair, that means he needs a switch or hub to
plug into, with coax type NIC, he only needs the proper termination.

He wants the cheapest device that will lure his router into
sending actual data to it.

I can only see a NIC qualify his needs if this NIC is placed in a
more or less fully functional PC.
Am I missing something here ?

--
Kind regards,
Gerard Bok
Gerard Bok
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby glen herrmannsfeldt » Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:20 am

James Knott wrote:

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

Or a cheap hub or switch. They might be more readily available.

He ask for the simplest. I have heard of people powering a transceiver
off a standard 9 volt battery, though probably not for very long.

Or, if he can find one, and old 10base2 NIC, a T coupler and a pair of
terminators should do it too. He could also use a 24 ohm resistor, in
place of the coupler and two terminators. Can't get much simpler than
that.

Maybe I missed something, but I believe most 10baseT devices won't send
data out unless they see link pulses coming in. A source of link pulses
can be convenient in testing. One can then do whatever one wants with
the bits coming out from the device.

-- glen
glen herrmannsfeldt
 

Re: Simplest hardware node

Postby James Knott » Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:20 pm

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

Maybe I missed something, but I believe most 10baseT devices won't send
data out unless they see link pulses coming in. A source of link pulses
can be convenient in testing. One can then do whatever one wants with
the bits coming out from the device.

I said 10base2, which is the old coax type ethernet. IIRC, it doesn't use a
link pulse. However, a baseT connection to a hub or switch should be OK as
the link pulse is use to check the connection to the hub/switch, not to
verify there's another computer on the network
..
James Knott
 

Next

Return to Ethernet

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron