Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:20 am Post subject:
How do you use those /29 sticky (static) IPs from SBC and be |
|
|
How do you use those /29 sticky (static) IPs from SBC and be protected?
Our office LAN 192.168.0.x network is simple. Only two PCs (one of
which is wireless getting IP from our linksys router), one networked
printer, and two network cameras (SONY SNC-M3).
I need the two cameras and the main PC to be mapped to three public IPs
so that the management from HQ can come in to browse the cameras and
map Drive D on main PC.
I have subscribed SBC static DSL with speed of 1.5m to 3m. SBC gave me
a /29 subnet of 6 useable sticky IPs which I need to do a PPPoE
authenication. When I do the PPPoE on the WAN side, I have one IP
(67.64.xx.118) assigned to the WAN interface. How can I use the rest of
the 5 IPs? The linksys wireless router doesn't map the LAN side IPs to
the WAN side IPs (for example 192.168.0.117 to 64.xx.117, and
192.168.0.116 to 67.64.xx.116) so as to allow outsiders to come thru
the router to see the network cameras. Even if the linksys did do it, I
still need to restrict only outsiders (the HQ mgmt) to come in, not
anyone else. Linksys WRT54G is simply not a firewall. So, two days ago,
I installed a PIX-506 cisco firewall and moved the linksys behind it. I
found out the PIX506 does do PPPoE and was able to get the IP but it
still doesn't do the LAN IPs to WAN IPs mapping. I gave up and put the
linksys back. Then I found out the article:
http://www.dslreports.com/faq/3759. I am still researching to find a
DSL router that has the DSL modem built-in, wireless 802.11G, stateful
inspection firewall, and maps LAN IPs to WAN IPs. I looked at Netopia
3347W but found out that when the address mapping is enable, the
so-called stateful inspection is not possible. If you have
comment/solution, please suggest. |
|
David Schwartz
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:20 am Post subject:
Re: How do you use those /29 sticky (static) IPs from SBC an |
|
|
<derekc@beyondautomation.com> wrote in message
news:1131950458.427086.34460@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | How do you use those /29 sticky (static) IPs from SBC and be protected?
Our office LAN 192.168.0.x network is simple. Only two PCs (one of
which is wireless getting IP from our linksys router), one networked
printer, and two network cameras (SONY SNC-M3).
I need the two cameras and the main PC to be mapped to three public IPs
so that the management from HQ can come in to browse the cameras and
map Drive D on main PC.
I have subscribed SBC static DSL with speed of 1.5m to 3m. SBC gave me
a /29 subnet of 6 useable sticky IPs which I need to do a PPPoE
authenication. When I do the PPPoE on the WAN side, I have one IP
(67.64.xx.118) assigned to the WAN interface. How can I use the rest of
the 5 IPs? The linksys wireless router doesn't map the LAN side IPs to
the WAN side IPs (for example 192.168.0.117 to 64.xx.117, and
192.168.0.116 to 67.64.xx.116) so as to allow outsiders to come thru
the router to see the network cameras. Even if the linksys did do it, I
still need to restrict only outsiders (the HQ mgmt) to come in, not
anyone else. Linksys WRT54G is simply not a firewall. So, two days ago,
I installed a PIX-506 cisco firewall and moved the linksys behind it. I
found out the PIX506 does do PPPoE and was able to get the IP but it
still doesn't do the LAN IPs to WAN IPs mapping. I gave up and put the
linksys back. Then I found out the article:
http://www.dslreports.com/faq/3759. I am still researching to find a
DSL router that has the DSL modem built-in, wireless 802.11G, stateful
inspection firewall, and maps LAN IPs to WAN IPs. I looked at Netopia
3347W but found out that when the address mapping is enable, the
so-called stateful inspection is not possible. If you have
comment/solution, please suggest.
|
I have yet to see a commodity DSL router that would allow you to use
both static IPs and NAT at the same time. Your best choice is probably to
get a router that can run a Linux distro and configure that to do whatever
you need. I recommend openwrt, but they're all good.
DS |
|