J. Clarke
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:20 pm Post subject:
Re: Is 100Base-TX switch or hub? |
|
|
bkbigpond wrote:
| Quote: | "James Knott" <james.knott@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:562dnUFAm4ZY3eTeRVn-rA@rogers.com...
Rick Jones wrote:
"Never" :) hardcode one side and not the other.
How do you "hardcode" an ordinary consumer level switch?
Most switches should at least allow this via a http interface or some gui.
Particular brand?
|
ROF,L. You've never actually encountered a consumer level switch, have you?
There is no http interface, no GUI, no telnet, no configurability at all
other than what can be done with switches on the front panel. To get that
sort of functionality you need a _managed_ switch, which is far, far more
costly than the 40 bucks that you pay for a 5 port gigabit Netgear.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
|
bkbigpond
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:26 am Post subject:
Re: Is 100Base-TX switch or hub? |
|
|
"J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@snet.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:dlct6402b8g@news1.newsguy.com...
| Quote: | bkbigpond wrote:
"James Knott" <james.knott@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:562dnUFAm4ZY3eTeRVn-rA@rogers.com...
Rick Jones wrote:
"Never" :) hardcode one side and not the other.
How do you "hardcode" an ordinary consumer level switch?
Most switches should at least allow this via a http interface or some
gui.
Particular brand?
ROF,L. You've never actually encountered a consumer level switch, have
you?
There is no http interface, no GUI, no telnet, no configurability at all
other than what can be done with switches on the front panel. To get that
sort of functionality you need a _managed_ switch, which is far, far more
costly than the 40 bucks that you pay for a 5 port gigabit Netgear.
BernieM
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
|
You're right. I've been spoilt for too long now surrounded by Cisco gear.
'Unmanaged' >= 'Unbearable'
BernieM |
|