Official - Collisions are errors - Nokia, Cisco
DComTalk.com Forum Index DComTalk.com
Discussion of VoIP, VPN, Video Conferencen, DSL and other data commucations.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web dcomtalk.com
Official - Collisions are errors - Nokia, Cisco

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DComTalk.com Forum Index -> Ethernet
Author Message
Guest






Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:20 pm    Post subject: Official - Collisions are errors - Nokia, Cisco Reply with quote

Hello,

Clearly no one can help however I feel
that some of you may be interested in the
following.


I have recently run into two devices that appear
to report ethernet collisions as interface
output errors.

1.
Nokia firewall IPSO 3.8

2.
Some Cisco switch or router (sorry did not
make a note of it at the time).


In the nokia case I had no immediate access to the
device connected to the Nokia via a point
to point link.

The Nokia was set to FD and was reporting Input errors
I set it to HD and then got output errors.
All via Voyager GUI.

Then I noticed that netstat -ni
showed that
number of collisions = number of errors.

snmp mibs (interface, transmission.dot3)
agreed that there were no late collisions.

Setting the Nokia to HD reduced the rate of
lost packets by a factor of about 100.
i.e. eliminated them.

The Cisco similarly reported the same number of
collisions as output errors, no late collisions
and I had confidence that the link was good for
reasons that I now forget.

I conclude:-
The two poisons, namely 'Collisions Are
Bad, Very Bad' and 'Half Duplex is Useless,
Completely Useless' have reached new levels
of power and are irresistable.


The only fix (other than re-education, which
can never succeed in this matter) is to
banish HD Ethernet from your network.

This seems a good argument for GBE
(or ATM:) to the desk.

Is in not amazing that two of the biggest
mistakes (and indeed they may be the only
significant errors) in the Ethernet (802.3)
standards appear to have been social errors
and not technical errors.

I refer of course to.
a) The selection of the term collision.
b) The Duplex auto-negotiation behaviour.

The latter has resulted in I guess
millions and millions of functionaly
impaired links due to the social
inevitability that 'FD is best' and
must be hand configured by any concientions
system admin while they simultaneously
don't bother to ensure that all devices
are so configured.
Back to top
James Knott
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:07 am    Post subject: Re: Official - Collisions are errors - Nokia, Cisco Reply with quote

anybody43@hotmail.com wrote:

Quote:
I conclude:-
The two poisons, namely 'Collisions Are
Bad, Very Bad' and 'Half Duplex is Useless,
Completely Useless' have reached new levels
of power and are irresistable.

Collisions within the first 512 bits are not errors, they're collisions and
entirely normal. Collisions occuring later are due to the failure of a
NIC, to detect traffic on the wire.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DComTalk.com Forum Index -> Ethernet All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




VoIP Solutions: Telephone Systems Electronics Satellite TV Tech & Gadgets
Powered by phpBB