Navas' modem posts and found them useful and very appropriate. I had since
stopped reading this group some 10 years ago or more but now in the market
for a voice modem for answering machine use and I see John is still in here
giving good advice and squelching out his critics with honesty and tact.
Thank you John for your dedication and helpfulness. I still recall the 300
baud days where each character sent/received was displayed on the screen
(C-64). Then when I moved up to an external Hayes 1200 baud I was in the
fast lane. US Robotics HST boxes made me feel like king of the hill. I
left analog as v.34 came in....
Now if I can't get 4M down and 1M up I'm distressed!!!!!!!
--
Charlie
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:0MC1f.118856$qY1.101310@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <di6sb9$2ccg$2@itssrv1.ucsf.edu> on Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:20:25 +0000
(UTC),
fazer89@borg.ucsf.edu (Caerus) wrote:
Really, do he work for SBC?
I have absolutely no relationship to SBC other than as a normal paying
customer of Cingular.
When ever somebody SLAMS Cingular or
SBC he comes to the defense.
Hardly. I do believe in personal resonsibility, and that not everything
about
big companies is bad. And I post quite a bit of helpful information. How
about you? ;)
Something fishy here...
Your inappropriate personal attack perhaps? ;)
http://tinyurl.com/9yxnd
For comparison purposes, your record:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_uaut ... g.ucsf.edu
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular